Some 420 pages of previously
classified documents on the 9/11/12 Benghazi attack have finally been
released. These documents are the transcripts
of secret testimony before Congress by high-level military personnel who had
intimate knowledge of the facts surrounding the Benghazi attack that killed
four Americans, including Ambassador Stevens.
This testimony establishes
incontrovertible evidence that President Obama and key members of his
administration knew that this attack was planned and executed by terrorists,
and not the result of a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Islamic video. Defense Secretary Panetta and Joint Chief
Dempsey, in fact, told President Obama of the nature of the attack less than
two hours after it began.
One obvious conclusion can be drawn
from this crucial testimony: blaming the attack on an anti-Islamic video was a
lie. The lie was uttered (perhaps
unknowingly) by Ambassador Susan Rice five days later on five different Sunday
talk shows. It was repeated by Secretary
Clinton not only on camera in a message to the American people, but also in the
most disgusting way to the parents of the deceased as their caskets were being
received on American soil. As we all
remember, the lie was repeated by the president on several occasions, including
in a speech to the United Nations. And
Jay Carney, the president's smirking toady, regurgitated the lie to the press
corps without a hint of shame, then and now.
It is more than mere speculation
that the purpose of this lie was purely political. The truth would have shown how wrong the
president was when his campaign speeches proclaimed that Osama bin Laden was
dead, that al-Qaida was on the run, and that terrorism -- thanks to him -- was
no longer a threat. Had he told the
truth he might have lost the election.
Questions still remain. Why did Dempsey and Panetta remain silent
when they knew Obama, Clinton, Carney, and Rice were lying? Of the two, Panetta is more culpable because
he was a civilian and not in the military chain of command like Dempsey. Anyway, who came up with the idea of blaming
the video?
I remember pundits early on saying
that if President Obama is ever proven to have lied about this, he should be
impeached. Now we have the proof. Will he be impeached? Of course not. Republicans know that even if they succeeded
in impeaching the president in the House, he would not be convicted by the
Democratic-controlled Senate, and Republicans know they would pay a political
price for that defeat, as they did with Clinton's impeachment.
The repeated lies, the multiple
scandals, the political shenanigans, the extra-legal actions, the disregard of
the Constitution, all these violations of his oath of office define this
president as a tyrant who places his personal power above the good of the
country. He won't be impeached, but he
deserves to be. We'll just have to wait
for history to render the final judgment.
No comments:
Post a Comment