Tons of studies have shown that
poverty is the greatest cause of developmental problems in children. Children
who grow up poor are far more likely to do poorly in school, to run away from
home, and to commit suicide. As adults they are far more likely to abuse drugs,
commit crimes, and go to prison.
Other studies have shown that the
United States has the world’s lowest rate of children living with both parents.
That rate is 69%, compared to China where the rate is 97% and in neighboring
Canada where it is 85%. Racial differences are just as startling: only 39% of
African-American children live with both parents, compared to 74% for white
households. It is not racist to point this out; this unfortunate reality is a
serious problem for the black community.
The link between poverty and family
structure is undeniable. Roughly half of all families headed by single mothers
are likely to be poor, while 10% of families headed by both parents are not.
One would think that Black Lives
Matter, a social movement advocating racial justice would care about that.
Strangely, its mission statement on this issue goes in the opposite direction.
At its launch in 2012, the founders
of Black Lives Matter made no secret of their Marxist ideology and their national
goal of removing our system of democracy and capitalism and replacing it with a
totalitarian communist state. But since the police killing of Michael Brown in
Ferguson and especially after the brutal murder of George Floyd and the violent
protests that it engendered, BLM’s focus has been on building a network of
local chapters of like-minded organizations opposing police violence against
black people.
To broaden its appeal, Black Lives
Matter is stressing inclusivity by displaying empathy for all blacks who suffer
from discrimination based on sex or gender identity, age, religion, immigration
status, or what it calls “the tight grip of heteronormative thinking,”
otherwise known as the domination of our culture by straight white males.
But when it comes to problems
associated with single-parent homes, it doesn’t place the blame on the
deterioration of family values. Instead it seeks to “dismantle patriarchal
practice,” and identifies the problem as caused by “Western-prescribed nuclear
family structure requirements.” In other words, it minimizes the importance of
having a father in the home. Instead, it prefers “extended families and ‘villages’
that collectively care for one another, especially our children…” Where have we
heard that before?
On another subject, it is sad that some
of us were not able to celebrate the 4th of July as we have in the
past. Few fireworks or parades, no family barbecue. But one person was not
unhappy with that. Colin Kaepernick, the quarterback who made his mark kneeling
during or national anthem, called the celebrations commemorating the nation’s
founding “a celebration of white supremacy.” I wonder what football fans in New
England would have thought if the Patriots had picked up Kaepernick to replace
Tom Brady. Better still, would Colin have insisted that the Patriots change the
team name?