The thermometer outside my kitchen
window read in the mid-20s this morning for the second time this week. Tomorrow looks like a third. I really hate this cold.
I keep a record of my utility bills,
and I see that my last two electricity bills covering the period between 12/23/13
to 2/23/14 show an increase of 25% over the same period last year, 159% over
the year before that, and a staggering 333% over the year before that one. I know it’s been cold, but 333%?
It occurs to me that huge increases in
electricity bills don’t affect everyone equally. A $160 increase for a family with, say, $4000
a month in household income represents a hit of 4% to the family budget. For another family living on $2,000 a month,
the hit is 8%. Simple math. I would venture to say, however, that the hit
on the first family is much easier to absorb, relatively speaking, than it is
on the family that lives on only $2,000, because the low-income family may
already be spending 25% of its income on electricity. Where is that family going to come up with an
extra $160 when it is already living on a much tighter budget?
According to the U.S. Energy
Information Administration, the cost of electricity has gone up 39% in the last
ten years. How can that be, with all the
increases in oil production and the boom in natural gas? The answer is simple: climate change.
Here’s how the thinking goes. The climate is changing (Of course, the
climate is changing. It always has). Climate change, according to apocalyptic
environmentalists, is caused by global warming (Let’s conveniently ignore the
fact that, contrary to dire predictions, the temperature of the earth hasn’t
increased significantly in 15 years).
And global warming is caused by carbon dioxide (Let’s also ignore that
it is absolutely essential to life on this planet, because it is the primary
source of the oxygen in the air we breathe.
Not exactly a weapon of mass destruction, as John Kerry claims it is.). So we have to curb carbon dioxide emissions,
especially from coal-fired plants.
Now it so happens that coal is the
cheapest source of electrical energy, and it accounts for 40% of electricity
production in this country. But the
brown shirts of the EPA want to shut down coal-fired plants. So they have
issued regulations to prevent new plants from being built and to make it
economically unreasonable for old plants to make the changes necessary to
satisfy the new emission standards. It
would be so much better, says the EPA, for coal to be replaced by renewable
energy sources like solar and wind. The problem is that the cost of energy
produced by solar and air is far greater than the cost of energy generated by
the coal it is meant to replace. And
solar and wind cannot produce anywhere near the amount of electricity we need.
President Obama, whose vision is of a
fossil fuel-free earth knew exactly what he was saying when he promised us that
the cost of electricity would necessarily skyrocket. Thank you, Mr. President. But how are we I going to pay our electricity
bills?
No comments:
Post a Comment