The news that Defense Secretary
Hagel is following lockstep behind President Obama in recommending a limit on
military pay raises, higher fees for health-care benefits and less generous
housing allowances to prune billions of dollars from the defense budget must
really be sitting well with the men and women who put their lives on the line
to protect our freedom.
There is no question that the
defense budget is bloated, but not because our troops are getting paid too
much. Some military families, in fact,
have so little income they qualify for food stamps. There
are three areas that could produce enormous savings. First, we need to close unnecessary bases
here and abroad. The Pentagon is
recommending a new round of base closings (BRAC), but it is running into a
stone wall in Congress. Our legislators
don’t want to cut anything in their own backyards. As Representative Joe Courtney, a Democrat
from Connecticut who serves on the House Armed Services Committee, said, “The
general sort of bias against BRAC is very strong in the House. Added to that, it’s an election year.” God forbid he should be placing the fiscal
welfare of this country above the need to protect his sinecure.
Second, we need to end contracts
to produce weapons systems that don’t meet operational or cost specifications,
or that the military doesn’t need or want. Here are just three examples. The new Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) is so
poorly built, it is, according to one test report , “…not expected to be
survivable in a hostile environment.”
What? But the Navy still keeps
building them at a cost of $813 million each, up from the original estimate of
$220 million.
Next is the M-1 Abrams tank. The Army has 2,300 of them with another
3,000 in storage. It doesn’t need any
more of them, but we keep building them.
Why? Because Ohio legislators
don’t want to close the plant that builds them. It would cost 16,000 jobs and affect 882
suppliers. This is what Congress
considers a jobs program.
Then there’s the C-27J Spartan
cargo aircraft. Every new plane that was
built went directly to an Arizona boneyard.
The Air Force didn’t need them, but Congress insisted on spending money
it had budgeted for them. I visited this
boneyard a few years ago. The planes
stored there, including the C-27J, are not dead; they can be recalled into
service at any time: 4,400 of them with a value of $35 billion. This taxpayer was very impressed.
Third, we should pare down the
bureaucracy in a Pentagon that is bloated with redundant administrative staff. There are about 31,000 people working in the
Pentagon these days. You would think
that this would be a good place to cut costs.
But these people are so essential that the size of the Pentagon’s vast
oversight organizations grew by 15% from 2010 to 2012 according to the Federal
Times.
If Secretary Hagel thinks that
reducing military pay and benefits is the way to go, then he should lead the
way and cut his first.
No comments:
Post a Comment